...For the Vive la France Blogathon...
French poster for The 400 Blows (1959) |
A few months after Jules and Jim’s
release early in 1962, Truffaut contacted Alfred Hitchcock and began
arrangements for their now world-famous interviews.
These conversations would take place at Universal Studios over eight days and
countless hours during the summer of 1962, and the two men would discuss in
depth each of Hitchcock’s films as well as his cinematic technique and
philosophy. Truffaut would have the recordings of their talks transcribed and,
once edited, Hitchcock/Truffaut would be
published in 1966.
As he set out to make his fourth film, The Soft Skin (1964), Truffaut declared that it would be, “…indecent, completely shameless, rather sad, but very simple.” The idea for the plot would come to him in various forms, including a very recent local news story, “the Nicole Gérard affair,” in which a 41-year-old married woman had taken public revenge on her unfaithful husband. Another inspiration came with a brief incident Truffaut had observed by chance, the sight of a couple kissing in the back seat of a taxi and the sound of their teeth clinking as they kissed. He assumed, taking in the passion of the kiss, that this had to be an adulterous moment. Further material must also have come from his own life; Truffaut was notoriously and incessantly unfaithful to his wife and they had already separated once because of it by the time he began The Soft Skin.
Truffaut and Hitchcock, 1962 |
As he set out to make his fourth film, The Soft Skin (1964), Truffaut declared that it would be, “…indecent, completely shameless, rather sad, but very simple.” The idea for the plot would come to him in various forms, including a very recent local news story, “the Nicole Gérard affair,” in which a 41-year-old married woman had taken public revenge on her unfaithful husband. Another inspiration came with a brief incident Truffaut had observed by chance, the sight of a couple kissing in the back seat of a taxi and the sound of their teeth clinking as they kissed. He assumed, taking in the passion of the kiss, that this had to be an adulterous moment. Further material must also have come from his own life; Truffaut was notoriously and incessantly unfaithful to his wife and they had already separated once because of it by the time he began The Soft Skin.
Jean Desailly and Nelly Benedetti |
Truffaut had pointed out to
Hitchcock the significance of the elements of fear, sex and death in the older director's films.
These elements would also play a prominent role in The Soft Skin. Despite being a distinguished
national figure, Pierre is an anxious, timid man. The film opens with scenes of him hurrying
to catch a plane to Lisbon, fearful that he will miss his flight. As he rushes in
traffic to Orly, Claudine Bouché’s
editing and Georges Delerue’s score accentuate the degree of Pierre’s
agitation, also setting an ongoing undertone of tension. And though Pierre is a
subdued character, his wife is a womanly woman, a passionate woman, and it is clear
that their marriage is still sexually alive. Pierre’s powerful attraction to
and obsession with Nicole imply his underlying carnal nature. And death…well,
that will come soon enough.
Françoise Dorléac |
As with Truffaut’s previous films, The Soft
Skin was shot in black and white and on location. In fact, keeping it
personal, he used his own apartment for the scenes set in Pierre and Franca’s
home. And as was his way, and in contrast to Hitchcock, he would present his primary characters evenhandedly. Pierre is depicted as neither hero nor villain,
he isn’t especially sympathetic or unsympathetic. He is a man – not unlike
Truffaut himself – who, in this case, has managed to make a mess of his life
without realizing it until it’s too late – which he also doesn’t realize.
From its frenetic opening, through its varied
domestic and illicit interludes to its climactic finale, The Soft Skin moves
deliberately and persistently toward its denouement. In the film’s final shot
Nelly Benedetti, as Franca, sits in a café, her eyes in a fixed stare and her mouth frozen in a small, enigmatic half-smile. The expression is hard to determine but for a fraction of a second we seem to recognize something and, with a
start, recall our last glimpse of Norman Bates in Psycho.
~
The Soft Skin
would be the first of four Truffaut “thrillers” – including Fahrenheit 451
(1966), The Bride Wore Black (1968) and Mississippi Mermaid (1969)
– that have come to be known as “Hitchcockian.”
The Soft Skin is
among the five Truffaut films highly recommended by the TSPDT Guide and has
been included among the BFI’s list of François Truffaut’s 10 essential films.
~
Click here for links to all Vive la France! participating blogs.
Okay. You sold me.
ReplyDeleteWell...that was easy!
DeleteIt definitely has a "cool, detached tone" and serves as essential viewing for Truffaut fans. I think Truffaut is often associated too closely with his Antoine Doinel films and JULES AND JIM. As you pointed out, he was a versatile filmmaker, whose passion for cinema could not be confined to a certain type of film. I remember Françoise Dorléac best from THAT MAN FROM RIO. It was sad that she died so young. She does remind me of her sister, Catherine Deneuve, at times.
ReplyDeleteThis is not one to watch over and over, though I do enjoy the film - the interlude in Reims is particularly good. I'm always interested in films that are unsuccessful on release but go on to glory. In this case it seems the critics and the public expected Truffaut's 4th film to be more like the first 3 than it was.
DeleteBeautiful review Patty. This is I think the only Truffaut I haven't seen. It will be high on my list. How exciting those early days of the New Wave must have been for its writers and then directors. And to the viewers too. Your various reviews capture the essence of their art and sources of inspiration wonderfully.
ReplyDeleteI hope The Soft Skin is to your taste, Christian. I came to it relatively late, 5 or 6 years ago, and wish I'd seen it closer to the time of its release. I understand it barely screened in the US, so there was little chance of that. Jean Desailly and Francoise Dorleac have the most screen time and both are superb, ideally cast. The film is well-written and well shot. There is one element of the plot that could've been better set up, but all in all it is one of Truffaut's best. What I wouldn't give to have been in Paris (and older than I was) from the late '50s through the mid-'60s. And thank you for your kind words and for co-hosting this blogathon with me, Christian.
DeleteMy pleasure to have co-hosted with you - many excellent blog posts with a great variety of films chosen. I'll look for screening opportunities for The Soft Skin. And Paris in the 50s was exploding with those American movies too - older 1940s movies just then being released that would be labelled "films noir."
DeleteWe must do this again next year, perhaps on Bastille Day (our original plan)...
DeleteOne of the great things about this blogathon is the introduction to so many fascinating films, some of which I've never even heard of. This is one such film, and you can bet I'll be looking for it soon.
ReplyDeleteThis was a different direction for Truffaut and, among other things, it proved his versatility. His filmography is diverse, I hope you have a chance to explore it, Ruth.
DeleteBeautifully written (as always). I am gingerly dipping my toes back into French cinema after decades of neglect. I think I can approach it with a more appreciative eye. Merci for hosting this lovely blogathon.
ReplyDeleteThank you! Wishing you a fabulous time on your upcoming trip - which I'm hoping will provide a side effect of enhancing your interest in French cinema.
DeleteI had never thought about that final smile like you did - and it makes a lot of sense. I love Truffaut and this film, as almost all his films, gets better as we rewatch it and investigate its influences. Wonderful article.
ReplyDeleteI'm inviting you to my blogathon. Feel free to participate as a blogger or reader:
https://criticaretro.blogspot.com/2019/08/announcing-luso-world-cinema-blogathon.html
Cheers!
Le
It was the last time I watched the film that the smile struck me the way that it did - as a subtle reflection of Norman Bates's final smile. Gave me a chill.
DeleteThank you for the invitation, Lê!
I'll have to see this film! Thanks for this great review!
ReplyDeleteI hope you do! Thank you, Virginie.
Delete